Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[2014 Highest 59] The Defendant married with the victim D in 2001, but still pending a divorce lawsuit. At around 10:00 on November 19, 2013, the Defendant brought a dispute with the victim at the home of the Defendant located in Hadonnam-gun E, and then she saw the victim's face to the victim's face, she saw the victim's head debt, she embbbs off with the victim's hand, and she saw the victim's face and chest back to drinking with the victim's face and chest back to drinking after the victim's buck back to the victim's neck. After having wraped the victim's neck with his arms continuously, the dangerous articles in this place were boomed with the victim's hand with the victim's injury, etc., so that she can not know the number of days of hair treatment, knbbs, etc.
[2014 Highest 233] Defendant:
1. On February 2, 2011, G singing room 2 located in YF, Jeonnam-gun, G Singing room 2, on the ground that the victim was the victim during the process of dispute with H and Sinan in the course of dispute with the victim D, H, etc., and the victim was injured by the victim, on the ground that the victim was the victim’s entrance skill once, resulting in the victim’s injury, such as an influence of the number of days of treatment days.
2. On February 2012, 2012, the Defendant’s house located in Ydonnam-gun E, sent shower D with the victim’s shower, and did not keep his clothes in a bath room as they were, on his hand, left the floor by putting the victim’s head, putting him/her down his/her head on the floor, and suffered injury, such as strawing around the snow that requires approximately two weeks of treatment due to drinking and spawn.
(2) The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the defendant did not assault the victim of the 2014 Highest 233 case. However, according to the evidence presented in the summary of the evidence below, the above argument is not accepted. Thus, the above argument is not accepted.)
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Examination protocol of suspect of victims D by the police;
1. Statement of the police officer with I