logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2017.02.08 2015나20650
토지인도 및 건물명도
Text

1. The judgment of the first instance, including the claim of the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) expanded in the trial, shall be modified as follows.

Reasons

1. Grounds for the court’s explanation concerning this part of the facts are stated by the first instance court.

D. In addition to deletion of paragraphs (f), the reasoning of the first instance judgment is the same as that of the corresponding part of the reasoning thereof, and thus, it is quoted by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The parties' assertion

A. The plaintiffs' assertion 1) The defendant has not yet paid KRW 30 million out of the aggregate of the deposit for lease agreed at the time of the lease of this case. The defendant violated the obligations under the lease contract, such as illegally expanding or reconstructing the real estate of this case, and even though it should pay the rent from March 17, 2014 according to the lease contract of this case, it did not pay it for the first time and paid the rent for the first time on May 17, 2014. Since the plaintiff did not pay it more than three months thereafter, it occupies and uses the real estate of this case. The plaintiffs filed the lawsuit of this case, and the plaintiffs expressed their intention to terminate the lease of this case on the grounds of the defendant's additional deposit for lease of this case, non-payment of the deposit for lease of this case, illegally increasing or delaying the lease of this case, the above complaint was delivered to the defendant at least 200,0000,0000,0000,000,0000,000.

arrow