1. Defendant A’s imprisonment of seven years and fine of 150,000,000 won, Defendant B’s imprisonment of two years and six months and fine of 48,00,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] Defendant D was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year for embezzlement at the Seoul Central District Court on July 10, 2008, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on July 18, 2008. On October 9, 2010, Defendant D was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for a crime of giving property in breach of trust at the Seoul Central District Court on October 9, 2010, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on October 9, 2010. On July 14, 2014, Defendant D was sentenced to a suspended sentence of three years for a suspended sentence of six months for fraud at the Jung District Court on June 14, 2014.

【Criminal Facts】

[Defendant A, B, C, and D] 2014 Highest 212, 289

1. On December 16, 2005, the Seoul Metropolitan Government, which is to serve as the Defendants, announced the Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Decision 61,850 square meters (hereinafter “instant W Project District”) as X district and Y district on September 18, 2008.

Defendant

A with respect to the above project district on December 31, 2008, after obtaining authorization for the establishment of the Z Housing Redevelopment Project Association (hereinafter referred to as the “Z Redevelopment Project Association”) and after completing the registration of the establishment of the above redevelopment Project Association on January 16, 2009, A has been working as the head of the above redevelopment Project Association and has overall control over the affairs of the Association.

Defendant

C plays a role as the driver of Defendant A, the president of the above redevelopment cooperative, and has been engaged in redevelopment works as a hub for redevelopment works by taking advantage of the friendship with the president of the cooperative.

Defendant

B, on September 5, 2008, a construction company specialized in Changho Construction Co., Ltd. actually operated AA and exercised influence over the selection of various service companies, has been engaged in activities as a hub for construction sites, such as redevelopment sites by using friendships with the officers and employees of redevelopment associations or their related parties.

Defendant

D is a vice president, etc. of AB (hereinafter referred to as "AB") specialized in removal services at the site of redevelopment reconstruction association and has been in charge of the role of arranging a service contract for removal site of buildings at various redevelopment associations or promotion committee's committee's meetings under the direction of AB C.

2.