logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2015.02.05 2014가합1979
인터넷카페폐쇄조치
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The plaintiff's assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion is the Internet portal site managed and operated by the Defendant (www.daum.net) published on C [B (hereinafter “B”)’s Kafbook (hereinafter “the instant Kafbook”).

(B) Through the Plaintiff’s assertion that Jeonju is a Damage to the reputation of Jeonju, such as asserting that Jeonju is a Chinese descendants. Since the instant carbook infringes on the Plaintiff’s reputation and personal rights, the Plaintiff’s right to claim the closure of the instant carbook based on his personality rights (the Plaintiff filed the instant claim on the ground that the instant carbook damages the reputation of Jeonju, but the Plaintiff’s assertion appears to include not only the instant carbook damages the reputation of Jeonju, but also the assertion that the instant carbook damages the reputation of the Plaintiff who is its descendants, but also damages the reputation of the Plaintiff who is its descendants, and also the instant carbook is also deemed to include the assertion that the instant carbook damages the reputation of Jeonju. (1) The illegality of the instant carbook posted at the Internet space by the Internet comprehensive provider is apparent, and it is also evident that the online bulletin was posted at the same time as the victim’s specific duty to block or block the posting on the Internet, but also if the posting on the Internet is not specifically known, its technical demand is not clearly known.

arrow