beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
"2017 Gohap 148"
1. On January 4, 2017, around 03:05, the Defendant: (a) at the main point of the “E” for the operation of the Victim D in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Busan, Seo-gu, Busan; and (b) at the time of Goyang-gu, U.S., the Defendant ordered the victim to pay the price even if the victim did not have the intent or ability to pay the price even if he/she ordered the alcohol and the alcohol; and (c) the Defendant received the payment of the price from the injured party and the delivery of the alcohol and the
2. A quasi-Robbery Defendant: (a) while the victim was requested to pay the amount from the victim D at the time and place specified in the preceding paragraph; (b) but was refused to pay the amount on the ground that there was no money; (c) the victim was placed on the victim’s bank at the lock-si, followed the victim’s bank on the victim’s own; and (d) KRW 70,000 in cash in that place
In spite of the witness's failure, when the witness was forced to pursue the theft, the victim's neck was assaulted to resist the recovery of stolen property and to escape arrest.
"2017 Gohap 213, August 12, 2017, the Defendant discovered that the victim H was locked up in the 19:34 around 19:34 on August 12, 2017, and “G” located in Pakistan, and the Defendant stated the Defendant’s written indictment of KRW 20,000 in cash owned by the victim and stated the Defendant’s statement as KRW 230,000,000,000,000,000,000 won. However, the Defendant was consistently stolen in the investigation process and in this court.
In light of the fact that the Defendant deposited KRW 24,100 into his account around August 12, 2017, immediately after the crime, the Defendant’s stolen cash was KRW 2,30,000.
As can not be readily concluded, the facts charged are modified as above to the extent that it does not interfere with the defendant's exercise of right to defense;
The market price's supersck cards, etc. were stolen by cutting off the unscams in the market.
Summary of Evidence
"2017 Gohap 148"
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Protocols of D police statements; and