beta
Text
The judgment below
Of them, the part against Defendant H and J is reversed.
Defendant
H The imprisonment of 2 years and 6 months and the fine of 100 million won;
Reasons
1. Summary of grounds for appeal;
A. Defendant B, H, and J’s sentence (Defendant B: imprisonment of one and half years and fine of 50 million won; imprisonment of three years and fine of 10 million won; Defendant H’s imprisonment of three years and fine of 100 million won; and Defendant J’s imprisonment of one year and six months) is too unreasonable.
B. Defendant E (1) misunderstanding of facts and misunderstanding of legal principles are Defendant E, and Defendant E (hereinafter “AK”)
(B) In relation to AK, after becoming aware of AK through CB around February 2012, 2012, two years after the date of the establishment of AK, the Promissory Notes (hereinafter referred to as “ Promissory Notes”) from CB.
(A) The purchase of Chapter 30,350,00 won per Chapter 30,000, among which 20,000 won per Chapter 20,000 won per Chapter 30,000 won per Chapter 1, sales of the remainder 10,000 won to AI, and 3,00,000 won per Chapter 1.
In relation to the case, around June 2012, two years and four months after the date of establishment of the AP, F was introduced to lend the name of representative director upon CB’s request and received 50,000 won, and CB purchased 30,000 won per 1 copy and 20,000 won per 1 copy, and sold 10,000 won per 2,450,000 won per 1 copy to the AI, and only 3,00,000 won per 2,00 won per 1 copy. Accordingly, Defendant E did not participate in the business of issuing and selling bills of this case as stated in the facts charged of this case. Although it was not so, Defendant E was liable for the above part of the facts charged of this case, namely, the portion of AK’s bill under the name of 89 and 300,000 won per 10,000 won per 2,000 won per 30,000 won per 1.
C. Defendant N1) misunderstanding of facts and misunderstanding of legal principles are as follows: Defendant N1’s crime sight table (2013 Godan2924) Nos. 2924 as indicated in the judgment of the court below (hereinafter “instant order”).
It shall be subject to the same goods as described in 1, 2, 4 through 8.