The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In a mistake of fact, the Defendant merely abused the victim’s face face by drinking, but did not incur any injury to the victim by using a cell phone, such as the opening and opening of the victim.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (six months of imprisonment, two years of suspended sentence) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The following circumstances acknowledged by evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below's decision on the assertion of mistake of facts, namely, ① the victim has consistently taken the face and part of the victim's cell phone from the investigative agency to the court of the trial. The victim's face and part of the body of the victim's cell phone from the investigation agency to the court of the court of the trial. According to the photograph taken immediately after the occurrence of the case, the victim was suffering from the front eye and part of the body of the victim's body or part of the body (it can be known that the victim suffered from the front eye and part of the body of the victim's body, suffered from the upper eye and part of the body of the victim's body, was flick, and there is no other circumstance to regard the above statement as being false or erroneous, ② the witness E of the court below's decision cannot reject the credibility of the victim's statement merely because it was not a witness from the beginning of the dispute between the defendant and the victim, and there is no error in the misapprehension of facts concerning the defendant's mobile phone use of this case's identity.

B. A crime committed in the course of disputing with the victim on the assertion of unfair sentencing, which was also injured by the defendant, is somewhat favorable to the defendant.