The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. The summary of the facts charged and the complainant B (the age of 18) came to know at around October 24, 2017 via C Messen.

The defendant was aware of a model before the complainant.

Along with the fact that she was able to talk directly after the end of his/her month. On October 25, 2017, he/she proposed that she was able to talk directly after the end of his/her month. On October 25, 2017, she was able to talk with the complainant, and she was able to go together in the direction of the complainant's office, and she was able to go as the complainant's house.

On October 25, 2017, at around 23:10 on October 25, 2017, the Defendant forcedly committed an indecent act against the complainant’s will, in a manner that the complainant’s body and clothes are opened from the room of the complainant in Busan Nam-gu, and the complainant’s body and clothes are opened up, and the complainant’s body and clothes are opened up, and the complainant’s body are opened up by hand.

2. Determination

A. The burden of proving the facts charged in a criminal trial is to be borne by a public prosecutor, and the conviction of guilt is to be based on evidence with probative value that makes a judge feel true to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt. Thus, if there is no such evidence, even if there is doubt as to the defendant's guilt, it is inevitable to determine the defendant's interest as the defendant's interest (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2010Do9633, Nov. 11, 2010).

The Defendant consistently and consistently raised a key from the police investigation stage to this court, and denies the facts charged to the effect that there is no fact that the Defendant forced kids or forced kis or forced physical contact.

In this case, it is so high that there is no room for doubt about the truth and accuracy of the statement in order to recognize the charge as guilty on the basis of the statement of the complainant.