logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.01.14 2014고정1415
재물손괴
Text

1. Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000;

2. If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who was living together with the victim C (math, 45 years of age).

1. On February 11, 2014, around 14:41, the Defendant: (a) found drunk in a “E” restaurant operated by the victim located in Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu; and (b) destroyed the said restaurant by placing a chemical part of 20,000 won of the market price owned by the victim at that place on the floor.

2. On March 2, 2014, at around 08:57, the Defendant, while drunk and found in the above restaurant, destroyed the electric wires of power distribution board so that the repairing cost amounting to 4.50,000 won.

3. On March 28, 2014, at around 03:00, the Defendant destroyed 10 percent of the total market value owned by the victim, which was found in the above restaurant and displayed in front of the restaurant.

4. On April 11, 2014, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol around 21:40, found in the above restaurant, but the victim was able to set up the entrance door of the restaurant, which was locked glass, and then damaged the repair cost to the extent that the repair cost is equivalent to 400,000 won.

5. On April 12, 2014, the Defendant found in the above restaurant on April 12, 2014, and cut the electric wires of the power distribution board in the restaurant, cut the electric wires of the outdoor advertisements, removed electric wires, removed electric wires, and damaged the repair cost by cut the telephone line in an amount equivalent to 150,000 won.

Summary of Evidence

【Facts 1, 2, and 3 at the Market】

1. The defendant's partial statement in the court (the defendant asserted that the franchising portion after March 28, 2014 is his own ownership, but the defendant transferred the franchis in this case to the victim C, and the relevant franchising portion was also transferred at that time or additionally prepared by C, so the defendant's allegation in this part is without merit).

1. C’s legal statement;

1. The second police statement about C (the fact of paragraph (4) at the time of market approval);

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of statement by the police about C (nine pages of investigation records);

1. A photograph of damage (15 pages of investigation records);

1. A criminal investigation report (seven pages of investigation records) (the fact of paragraph (5) at the time of printing);

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. C’s legal statement;

1. Application of the Investigation Report (17 pages of Investigation Record) Act 1.

arrow