logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2020.01.16 2019나52389
공사대금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. On February 2017, the Plaintiff determined the cause of the claim: (a) around February 2017, the Defendant Company performed file distribution works among E elementary school gymnasiums and meal service facilities extension works that the Defendant Company received from the Seoul Northern District Office of Education according to the direction of the head of the Defendant Company’s site director C, etc.; and (b) the Defendant Company has not paid the said construction price up to the present date

However, the evidence submitted by the plaintiff and the defendant company entered into the file port construction contract.

It is insufficient to recognize that the Plaintiff completed the file distribution work.

Plaintiff

The argument is without merit.

2. The judgment of the first instance court at the conclusion is justifiable.

The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

arrow