Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 5,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 00:50 on February 1, 2020, Defendant A: (a) sent a cab to E slopeF belonging to E, working in the situation after getting on a taxi and arriving at the taxi; (b) reported that Defendant A would pay a fare to a taxi engineer upon arrival in the district of the private village B, in which F was contacted; and (c) reported that “the police officers would not know it; (d) I am this son; and (e) I am am frien; and (e) am frien, who was urged to go home from F to go home from F without any justifiable reason.”

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to their duties in the district.

2. Defendant B reported that he was arrested as a flagrant offender A at the time, time, and place described in paragraph (1) at the same time, and reported that he was arrested as a flagrant offender, and that the police officer was sounded to the police officer, and that G was taken by the police officer outside of A with his cell phone, and that he used his cell phone to take the son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s seat

As a result, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties of police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Each police statement concerning G and F;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes on photographics of the suspect A and B;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136 of the same Act concerning the applicable criminal facts, the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The fact that the police officer in uniformed for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the degree of violence, the defendant A has no record of punishment exceeding a fine, and the defendant B has no record of criminal punishment, the fact that there is no record of criminal punishment, the fact that all of the crimes are recognized, and the age of the defendants and the age of the defendants.