1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows: "No. 19-1 of the evidence is insufficient to recognize the defendant's assertion that the defendant ordered the plaintiff to resume production of the instant landet on or around May 2013 as additional evidence submitted by the court of first instance, and the part "(or, even if the defendant delayed the request for the suspension of production of the instant landet, it does not change the conclusion that the plaintiff's assertion is groundless because there is no evidence to prove the damage suffered by the plaintiff due to the delay, even if the defendant delayed the request for the suspension of production of the instant landet, it is difficult to conclude that the plaintiff's assertion was made with the exception of the above evidence No. 12 of the Civil Procedure Act)" of No. 10 through No. 18 of the judgment of the court of first instance, "(or, even if the defendant delayed the request for the suspension of production of the instant landet, it seems that the plaintiff sold the instant landet in online shopping mall around September 2013."

2. Thus, the plaintiff's claim shall be dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in its conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.