logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2020.02.05 2019고정1690
의료법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10 million.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a business owner who operates a marina business establishment with the trade name “C” located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government B and 6, and D is an employee of the said business establishment.

E In addition, on May 15, 2019, after entry into the Republic of Korea as tourism visa.

5.22. to 2.0

6. Until June 25, 201, F enter the Republic of Korea on June 1, 2019

6.3.0 to 6.0

6. Until December 25, 200, foreigners of Thailand nationality who worked at the said establishment as a massage and marina branch, although they were not entitled to be a massage club.

1. A Marine who is a visually disabled person shall be accredited to the Mayor/Do governor, and shall not open a massage place unless he/she is accredited to the Mayor/Do governor;

Although the Defendant and D did not have the qualification as a massage, the Defendant: (a) had the nationality of Thailand to operate a marina business; (b) had the Defendant established a “C” business establishment from May 17, 2019; and (c) from June 14, 2019 to the head of the above business establishment; and (d) had the Defendant paid KRW 2,00,000 per month in return for operating the said business.

The defendant and D shall operate the above business establishment from May 22, 2019 to E, and the same year.

6.3. From 3. to 1.20,00 won per month, and 10% of expenses per marina land, respectively, were paid in addition to the monthly basic monthly wage of 1.2 million won, and they made them know to the general public.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with D, established a massage clinic without being accredited.

2. No person shall employ any person having no status of sojourn for employment activities;

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as seen above, employed E and F as the head office of each of the above businesses, who did not have the status of stay for job-seeking activities after entering the Republic of Korea as a tourist visa.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each suspect interrogation protocol of E, F, and D;

1. Application of each passport copy and each immigration status Acts and subordinate statutes; and

1. Article 87 of the Medical Service Act and Article 87 of the same Act concerning criminal facts;

arrow