Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for six months and for four months, respectively.

(2) the date of this judgment.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A, from January 31, 2018 to March 26, 2018, operated a commercial sex business establishment in “D” located on the seventh floor of Seo-gu Daejeon Special Metropolitan City building from around January 31, 2018, and carried out commercial sex acts by directly receiving 120,000 won of commercial sex acts from the daily average number of men who are not in the name of 1-2.

2. On July 4, 2017, Defendant B, as the manager of the Seo-gu Daejeon Building, entered into a lease agreement between Defendant B and the 7th floor of the said C building to lease “D” to KRW 20 million monthly rent of KRW 20 million and KRW 7 million, and had A operate a commercial sex business establishment in the said “D” as described in paragraph 1, and provided a building with the knowledge of the fact that it was provided for commercial sex acts, and conducted activities such as arranging commercial sex acts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. E statements;

1. On-site photographs and photographs of the lease contract;

1. Each internal investigation report and the application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing each investigation report;

1. Defendant A of the relevant criminal facts: Article 21(1) of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including Mediation, etc. of Commercial Sex Acts: Article 19(1)1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including Mediation, etc. of Commercial Sex Acts;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act for the suspension of execution;

1. Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Mediation of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. [Defendant A: 120,000 won on average daily income 】 55 days = 6.6 million won, Defendant B: 2 million won per month 】 2 million won];

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, respectively, of the order of provisional payment;

1. The fact that Defendant A was erroneous is favorable for the Defendant to recognize the error.

However, on January 30, 2018, the Daejeon District Court issued a summary order of a fine of eight million won for a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts such as brokerage of sexual traffic (such as brokerage of sexual traffic), and even though the record of punishment for violation of the Act on the Protection of Educational Environment and the suspension of indictment for sexual traffic was past, it is not easy to punish the crime in that of re-offending.