1. The Defendant has executory power over the case of the purchase price for goods 2013 tea 135, which is the Suwon District Court in relation to B.

1. Basic facts

A. On August 17, 2016, the Defendant seized each movable property indicated in the attachment list (hereinafter “instant movable property”) in attached Form No. 326, 323, 326, 403, in title, with the title of execution of the execution order for payment with executory power over the case Nos. 2013j135, the Suwon District Court of Suwon-si, the execution place of which was the execution place.

(C) Sungnam District Court 2016No. 1996). (b)

The plaintiff is a wife B, and is living together with B at the above seizure place.

[Ground of recognition] The non-existence of dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 to Gap evidence 3, purport of whole pleading, and purport of whole pleading

2. The plaintiff asserts that the movable property of this case in this case is subject to compulsory execution procedure for separate compulsory execution procedure for B, and thus compulsory execution should not be allowed because it was one's own ownership.

In regard to this, the Defendant asserts that the present movable property is owned by B, since the location of the present movable is different from that of the present movable property at issue, and the appraisal is different from that of the present movable property, it cannot be viewed as the same object, and it cannot be recognized that the Plaintiff newly purchased the remaining movable property.

In full view of the evidence mentioned above and the purport of Gap evidence Nos. 6 and Gap evidence Nos. 8 (including the main numbers), the plaintiff was awarded a bid for corporeal movables listed in the attached auction list on March 15, 2013 by applying for a preferential purchase in the auction procedure for corporeal movables No. 2013No. 99 against the Suwon District Court, Sung-nam Branch of the Suwon District Court on March 15, 2013. The place where the above movables were seized at the time is different from the location of the movables of this case, "No. 207 Dong-dong 601, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-si, the attached list Nos. 1 through 4, 6, 7, 9, 10, 12, and 13 are identical to the above auction list, but it is acknowledged that appraisal differs from the above auction list, and there is doubt as to whether the goods at issue and the movables of this case are identical to the goods at issue.