A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

The telephone financial fraud organization (one-time “scaming”), in operating the call center in China, etc., is divided into the following roles: “total liability” which takes charge of organic liaison between the organization and the internal point organizations; “one-time call center staff” which falsely speaks to the effect that a large number of unspecified people in the Republic of Korea may transfer money to a designated account or deliver money to the sender by misrepresenting the Financial Supervisory Service, inspection, etc.; “ call center staff” who is provided with the account to be used for the crime of Boscing from the account holder; and “cash collection” which receives money by misrepresenting the staff of the Financial Supervisory Service, etc. from victims.

On October 2019, the Defendant accepted the role of cash collection from the employees of Bosing Ba that he came to know in the Round around the end of the end of October, 2019, and agreed to take the role of collecting cash from the victims, and transferring the amount of Bosing damage to the account designated by the said Bosing Organization.

On November 11, 2019, at around 09:30 on November 11, 2019, a false statement was made to the effect that “The new head of the Tong was used as the one for the one hand. The withdrawal and delivery of the money deposited in the table, which will be sent to the staff of the Financial Supervisory Service, would return the money after confirmation of suspicion.”

On November 12, 2019, the Defendant continued to receive instructions from the unclaimed winners of name on November 12, 2019, and took place in front of the Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Z as if he was an employee of the Financial Services Commission, and the Defendant got cash of KRW 16 million from the victim. From around 14:00 on the same day, the Defendant got cash of KRW 20,130,000 in the same way as before the exit of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 5,00.

As a result, the defendant was given property from the victim by deceiving the victim in collusion with the victim in false name.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant;