beta
Text
1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs and the defendant are dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.
purport, purport, and.
Reasons
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. On December 31, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around 22:30 on December 31, 2012, the E-cafeteria operated by the Plaintiff A (hereinafter referred to as the “instant restaurant”).
(2) On June 12, 2013, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 700,000 as Changwon District Court Heading around 200,000 on June 12, 2013, which issued a summary order of KRW 700,00 as the above court heading around 2013 Gowon District Court heading around 200,000, and filed a request for a formal trial on May 23, 2014. The above court sentenced the Defendant to a fine of KRW 70,000,00,000, which was convicted of the Defendant on May 23, 2014.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings
B. According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiffs for the damages suffered by the plaintiffs due to the above illegal acts.
2. Scope of liability for damages
A. Considering the developments leading up to the occurrence of the instant accident, the Plaintiffs’ age, occupation, and all the circumstances revealed in the argument of the instant case, consolation money that the Defendant is liable to compensate to the Plaintiffs is reasonable as KRW 500,000, respectively.
B. While Plaintiff A seeking payment of KRW 3,00,000 from the actual income by asserting that Plaintiff A failed to operate the restaurant of this case due to the Defendant’s assault or incurred losses due to his neglect of business, Plaintiff A failed to operate the restaurant of this case due to the Defendant’s assault.
The plaintiff A's above assertion is without merit, since there is no evidence to prove that the plaintiff suffered losses from the above lost income amount.
C. Accordingly, it is reasonable for the Defendant to dispute the existence or scope of the obligation of the Defendant from December 31, 2012, which was the date of the above illegal act, with respect to the consolation money of KRW 500,000 due to violence to the Plaintiffs.