(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2019.09.20 2018고단4049

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2019.09.20 2018고단4049

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of seven million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a siren car.

around 07:00 on October 20, 2018, the Defendant entered the two-lanes of the front road in the D parking lot located in Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si.

Since the vehicle traffic volume was high at the time, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle shall not drive a motor vehicle at a speed or in such a manner as to cause danger and obstacle to road traffic conditions by accurately manipulating the front and rear left, steering gear, brake system, etc., and has a duty of care to drive the motor vehicle safely.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and did not confirm the vehicle that is proceeding on the road, without entering the road, and caused the Defendant to lose the power during the process of reporting the Defendant’s vehicle that was driven by the victim F (28 years old) drive on the two-lane behind the Defendant’s bed and driving the vehicle on the part of the Victim F (28 years old). The Defendant lost the power while driving the vehicle on the part of the Defendant’s bed and moved the vehicle on the road.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as “the escape certificate of conical and conical signboards” in the number of days of treatment due to occupational negligence, and at the same time, the victim’s truck was destroyed to the extent of scrapping, but failed to immediately stop and take necessary measures, such as providing relief to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness F and G;

1. The investigation report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, the details of the victim's emergency room, the medical certificate, and the defendant and the defense counsel cannot be deemed to have caused the traffic accident of this case by negligence on the part of the defendant's business. Since the above traffic accident at the time of the case was absent from the scene because they did not recognize that it was caused by his own negligence, the defendant's act did not have the intention of escape. However, the defendant's act caused the result of

유사 판례

-울산지방법원 2016.06.03 2016노264

-대전지방법원 2015.08.13 2015고단803

-서울중앙지방법원 2020.04.29 2019고정1868

-광주지방법원 2016.08.17 2015노3216

-인천지방법원 2015.05.20 2015고단1403