logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.12.06 2018고단5774
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, each of the above defendants is against the defendants for a period of one year from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants shared money with friendship and leased three officetels, including the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D 503, E 405, and the former F 305, and followed the operation of an officetel commercial entertainment business establishment under the trade name of "G". At the same time, from July 2, 2018 to July 19, 2018, the Defendants reported the advertisement of the commercial entertainment site that they posted at each of the above officetels from July 2, 2018 to July 4, 2018 and 5 male guests received 80,000 or 160,000 won as the price for commercial sex acts from female workers H (n, 35 years of age) employed in advance and had three persons, including those female workers engaged in commercial sex acts, do sexual intercourse with the above male guests.

As a result, Defendants conspired to arrange sexual traffic for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of the Defendants to the prosecution

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect of H or I;

1. On-site control and the Defendants’ mobile phone message photographs;

1. Details of the J message conversation;

1. Report on investigation (Calculation of Additional Imposition Charges) applying Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act for the suspension of execution;

1. Additional collection (as to Defendant A), Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic (as to Defendant A), the reasons for sentencing are against the Defendants’ acknowledgement of the facts charged, and all the Defendants are the first offender who has no criminal history, and considering the period and scale of business and the size of business, it appears that the Defendants did not have much profits when considering their age, sexual conduct, environment, motive and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence identical to the order shall be determined by comprehensively taking account of various conditions of sentencing as indicated in the instant pleadings

arrow