logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.01.27 2015나43478
양수금
Text

1. The part of the judgment of the first instance against the plaintiff shall be revoked.

2. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff KRW 911,133 and KRW 483,257 among them.

Reasons

1. The scope of the judgment in this court claimed against the defendant for the payment of two claims that the plaintiff acquired from Hyundai Capital Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Modern Capital”) and the claims that the plaintiff acquired from the Dadern Loan Co., Ltd., and the court of first instance dismissed the claims as to one of the two claims that the plaintiff acquired from Hyundai Capital and accepted only the remainder of claims.

The plaintiff appealed against the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, the scope of the judgment of this court is limited to the claims dismissed in the court of first instance among the two claims that the plaintiff acquired from Hyundai Capital.

2. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the pleadings as indicated in Gap evidence Nos. 1, 3, 4, 6, and 8, the defendant: (a) purchased by Hyundai Card Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Modern Card") and used (including card loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan loan

According to the above facts of recognition, the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff damages for delay calculated at the rate of 17% per annum, as claimed by the Plaintiff, within the agreed interest rate of 17% per annum from February 14, 2015 to the day of full payment, with respect to the principal and interest of the instant bonds and the principal of 483,257 won from the date following the above calculation date of interest.

3. Conclusion

arrow