logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.05.11 2017고단656
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) is a person who is engaged in driving of B rocketing sirens.

On October 18, 2016, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol content of 0.122% in blood around 22:10, while driving the car, and led to the speed that the Defendant cannot be seen as an intersection through the intersection at the center of the central hospital where it is located in the Blue-gun, Yan-gun.

At the time, commercial buildings and apartment houses have been stored at night, and there are cases where people want to cross their own roads, so in such a case, a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle has a duty of care to thoroughly look at the front side and the right and the right of the motor vehicle, to accurately manipulate the steering and the right and the right of the motor vehicle, and to prevent the accident in advance.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and found the victim C (66) crossing the road to the right side of the left side of the road due to the negligence of the defendant's failure to stop driving, but the defendant got the victim to leave the road.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as a cage cage cage cage cages, which requires approximately five weeks of treatment due to the above occupational negligence.

2. On October 18, 2016, the Defendant: (a) driven a B rocketing motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol by 0.122% from the front of the luminous apartment apartment in the Crack-gun, the Nam-gun, the Nam-gun, the Nam-gun, the South Korean Peninsula, around October 22, 2016, to the place of the accident.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with respect to C and D;

1. A report on the detection of a primary driver;

1. The circumstantial report of the driver employed at the main place;

1. A survey report on actual conditions;

1. Inquiries about the results of crackdown on drinking driving;

1. The application of the law of the medical certificate.

arrow