1. The Defendant’s KRW 1,254,558,30 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from January 15, 2013 to December 5, 2013.

1. Basic facts

A. On November 2, 2002, the Defendant authorized the establishment of a reconstruction association for the housing reconstruction project (hereinafter “the Treatment Member Housing Association”) which was composed of the purpose of implementing the housing reconstruction project on the ground, such as 627, Doang-dong, Doang-dong, etc., and thereafter, the Defendant conducted the housing reconstruction project for the purpose of implementing the housing reconstruction project on the ground, including 50 Doang-dong and 2 lots of land, for the purpose of implementing the housing reconstruction project on the ground (hereinafter “the Doang-si Housing Association”), the association for the apartment reconstruction project (hereinafter “the Doang-si Housing Association”), the association for the purpose of implementing the housing reconstruction project on the ground of 30 and 2 lots of land (hereinafter “the Doang-si Housing Association”), the association for the purpose of implementing the housing reconstruction project on the ground of 50 Doang-dong and 540,540-1, 201, the association for the purpose of implementing the housing reconstruction project on the ground (hereinafter “the 5 Doang apartment reconstruction project”).

B. On June 21, 2002, the Governor of the Gyeonggi-do announced the Gyeonggi-do public notice on June 21, 2002, that the modification of the king urban management plan was to change the specific use area from the general residential area to the Class-II general residential area. 2) The Defendant collected the opinions of the Hanju Apartment Apartment Association and the Treatment Housing Association, and formulated an urban management plan for the king Han Man-do Do governor. The Gyeonggi-do public notice on December 23, 2004 was issued as the Gyeonggi-do public notice No. 2004-403, the Gyeonggi-do public notice on December 23, 2004.