A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On December 7, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint assault) in the support of the Sugwon method of Sugwon, and the judgment on the 15th of the same month was finalized on the 15th of the same month.

1. On September 3, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 04:05 on September 3, 2017, at the C cafeteria located in Ansan-si Member B; (b) on the ground that food was not promptly taken to other customers; (c) was placed on the floor of the table; (d) was killed and threatened with the victim D (V, 48 years old), who is an employee; (d) was killed and discarded to the customer in the cafeteria; and (e) obstructed the victim’s operation of the cafeteria by force.

2. On September 3, 2017, at around 05:02, the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender with the interference with the duties set forth in paragraph (1) of the Road Traffic Act, and was under investigation of the interference with the duties at the F police box of the Ansan-si Police Station of the Ansan-gu, Ansan-si, a member of the National Police Station of the National Police Station in Ansan-si, and was parked by the Defendant in front of the said business establishment, while the Defendant was drunkd from the Defendant, and the G K7 passenger cars owned by the Defendant was parked in front of the said business establishment, and the Defendant was driving a

Defendant, such as statement, was driving a vehicle while under influence of alcohol;

There are reasonable grounds to recognize that a police officer did not comply with a request for the measurement of drinking alcohol without justifiable grounds, even though he/she was requested by H to comply with the measurement of drinking by inserting approximately 30 minutes a drinking measuring instrument over the 30 minutes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of a suspect of the police officer regarding I;

1. Written statements of D and J;

1. The ledger using the drinking-free measuring instruments and the report on the circumstances of the driver of the drinking-free vehicle;

1. A previous conviction: A written inquiry, a written inquiry, a report on the result of a previous conviction and the application of the judgment-making statute;

1. Article 314 (1) (Interference with Business) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense, and Articles 148-2 (1) 2 and 44 (2) (to refuse to measure drinking) of the Road Traffic Act (to choose to imprisonment), respectively;

1. Article 37 of the Criminal Code for the Treatment of Concurrent Crimes