1. The plaintiffs' appeals against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

1. The grounds for the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance are the same as the grounds for the judgment of the court of first instance, except for cases where the judgment is used or added as follows, and thus, they are quoted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of

2. Parts used or added;

A. Of the judgment of the first instance court, “the resolution” in the third 18th 18th 12,074, 11,652, among the 12,074, was approved by 11,652.

(b) Out of the judgment of the first instance, the fifth to Twelve parts of the judgment shall be followed as follows:

shall be subject to this subsection.

In addition, Defendant J did not comply with the procedures related to the process of taking the necks under the Constitution of the United States S religious order(S).

Nevertheless, on October 14, 1986, the Korea Labor Union, which belongs to the U.S. religious order, acquired the qualification for robbery of Q Q religious order in the U.S. and recognized that it followed the procedures related to the shooting process in the U.S. Constitution of the U.S. religious order, and approved Defendant J's neck.

Therefore, the number of pastors against the defendant J, which belongs to the U.S. S. religious order, is null and void, since it is not in compliance with the requirements, the defendant J is not a pastor belonging to the U.S. religious order.

C. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part of the fifth instance, “The permission for transfer admission to Defendant J of the said new abuse institute is null and void as the academic background was falsely stated,” as follows.

The academic background was falsely stated.

In addition, around March 2002, Defendant J submitted a letter of recommendation to establish a new university graduate school, one of the documents related to admission, and the fact was submitted by Defendant J, even though Defendant J was a pastor belonging to the American religious order Twitter, by stating it falsely as a candidate for the pastor of the instant church attached to the instant religious order.

Accordingly, the defendant J was notified by the president of the O University on December 2016. D.

'4.b) judgment of the first instance court.

Determinations (from 5 to 12 pages 19) shall be made as follows.

B. Determination Gap 1, 22, 52, 82.