The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a vehicle B K5 vehicles.

On 12:00 on 24, 2020, the Defendant driven the above car, which led to the driving of the D store, in front of the D store, in the direction of E, to drive at an indefinite speed in the direction of E, along with one lane in the direction of the zone located in the direction of E.

At the same time, there is a road in the market and the right side of the road are installed, and there was a plan for pedestrians to cross the road in the above D shop and the victim F (the age of 84) was trying to cross the road. Therefore, there was a duty of care to confirm whether a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a road by reducing speed, and properly manipulating the steering and brakes so as to prevent accidents in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and did not immediately find the victim crossing the road to port from the right side of the direction of the vehicle driving to the left side, and received the part as the chief side of the said vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as the left-hand gral gral gral gral and gral on the left-hand gral.

2. Determination

(a) Applicable legal provisions: Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

(b) Crimes of non-violation of an intention: The main sentence of Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents;

C. After the prosecution of this case, the injured person expressed his intention not to punish the Defendant.

Judgment dismissing Public Prosecution: Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act