All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the sentence of the lower court (for the Defendants, 10 months of imprisonment and 6 months of short-term) is too unreasonable.

2. The Defendants recognized the mistake of the instant crime and are in profoundly against the intent to commit the instant crime.

Defendants are still admitted to the circumstances of age as a juvenile.

However, the Defendants were subject to juvenile protection disposition several times for the same crime, and they were released from prison due to special larceny, etc. even though they were sentenced to punishment, so they committed each of the crimes of this case during the period of repeated crime.

Until the end of the trial, there was no agreement with the victims.

In addition, in full view of all the sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, family relationship, etc., each sentence imposed on the defendants by the court below is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the Defendants’ appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the Defendants’ appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.