logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2013.05.03 2013노220
상해
Text

The judgment of the court below is reversed.

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. According to the evidence submitted by the Prosecutor, even if it is not acknowledged that the Defendant inflicted bodily injury upon C, such as satisfafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafab

Nevertheless, the lower court erred by misunderstanding the facts charged and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. Ex officio determination of ex officio, the prosecutor examined the facts charged by the court below which found the defendant not guilty on the grounds that the court below found the defendant not guilty on the following third-A.

As stated in the foregoing paragraph, the application for changes in the indictment was filed, and the subject of the adjudication was changed by this court, so the judgment of the court below was no longer maintained.

However, the prosecutor's assertion of misunderstanding of facts is still subject to the judgment of this court, and this is examined.

3. Determination on the grounds for appeal

A. Around April 14:00 on April 7, 2012, the Defendant visited the victim C (the 37 years of age) who is pending in a divorce lawsuit with his/her father-gu, Incheon, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, where the victim C (the 37 years of age) was living together with his/her father.

While the Defendant and the victim were in dispute with the Defendant and the victim, while leaving a mobile phone, the Defendant got off the cell phone and got off the cell phone, and the victim was scambling the victim with the defect of “recording.” The Defendant got off the cell phone, and the Defendant was scambling the victim’s arms in order to bring the cell phone back again, and scambling the victim’s arms and scambling the chest, so that the number of days of treatment cannot be known to the victim.

B. The following circumstances, which can be acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, namely, ① the investigation agency stated that C had a hole to the right arms due to the Defendant’s assault, and accordingly, the 'blue blue part' is below.

arrow