logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2014.01.22 2013노2603
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)등
Text

The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and by imprisonment with prison labor for four months.

except that this shall not apply.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that each sentence (for defendant A: 10 months of imprisonment; for 8 months of suspended sentence; for 2 years of suspended sentence; for 8 months of probation; for community service) sentenced by the court below to the defendants is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of this case is that Defendant A was wraped with tobacco in the elevator, and the two victims were wraped with each other, and the degree of injury suffered by two victims was not less than four weeks, respectively, and Defendant A was under the same offense, and Defendant A was under the punishment of two times, under the suspension of execution, once a fine is imposed, six times, and Defendant C was under the punishment of a fine once a fine. As seen above, Defendant B was under the contingent fighting, Defendant B was under the punishment of three weeks, Defendant C was under the two weeks of age, Defendant C was under the control of two weeks of age, Defendant C was under the control of two weeks of age, the Defendants were under the control of two weeks of age, and the rest of the victims except for the victim G, and Defendant A was also under the agreement with the victim G, and Defendant C was under the control of the victim's opportunity to cooperate with the victim, and Defendant C was under the control of the victim and the circumstances of the case before Defendant G was under the control of the 10th of 210th of age.

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the court below is reversed in accordance with Article 364(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act as the defendants' appeal is with merit.

Criminal facts

The Court shall have jurisdiction over the summary of the evidence and evidence.

arrow