logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2014.04.17 2014고단308 (1)
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant and C around July 2011, 2011, the Defendant: (a) caused the enemy in the office of the item sales, making it difficult to prepare operating expenses for the office; and (b) caused the need for money such as the occurrence of the situation where the existing obligation is to be repaid, etc., they thought that they received the loan by illegal means and used the loan separately.

Accordingly, C allows D to find out how loans can be granted in the name of the defendant and others, and D to find out illegal loans through a lender who was known to the general public, and the defendant conspireds to receive loans in his name.

Defendant, C, and D, around November 201, had been paid by the Defendant, along with the first name “E office chief”, “F, etc., the former loan hub, and the Defendant was working for the company in a normal condition. The Defendant, C, and D took out a loan from a financial institution as if the deposit money for the apartment to live is necessary and took out a loan from the financial institution, and then terminated the apartment lease contract, thereby divided the above loan.

around December 8, 201, the Defendant, C, and D applied for a loan of KRW 70,00,000 to the person in charge of the loan of the above bank at the Seongbuk-gu Incheon Metropolitan Government Seongbuk-dong, 1244, and continued to submit a certificate of employment, etc. stating that the Defendant, who was issued from the above office, has worked in a company of “G”, and submitted a certificate of employment, etc. on or around December 9, 201, he/she purchased by the above F in coloring the target apartment as the Defendant leased No. 101, 1909, the Daegu-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government apartment site H apartment 101, 1909, which was purchased by the above F, to the said lender.

However, the Defendant did not have worked in the company with the trade name “G”, and the Defendant, C, and D immediately terminate the above lease contract and received the loan as a loan for the entire term.

arrow