1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant in excess of the money ordered to be paid below shall be cancelled.

1. The following facts do not conflict between the parties, or each of the following facts can be acknowledged by taking into account the following facts: Gap evidence Nos. 1 to 4, Eul evidence No. 6, and the purport of the whole pleadings in the first instance trial of the plaintiff himself. A.

On October 10, 2013, the Plaintiff advertised that “the partnership is found” on the daily living information log, and the Defendant reported the above advertising and contacted the Plaintiff, and thereafter, the Plaintiff and the Defendant provided the two-year teaching system.

B. On December 22, 2015, the Defendant, at the Defendant’s house, No. C, and 301, told the Plaintiff to the effect that “the Plaintiff had installed and supervised the Plaintiff,” and the Plaintiff demanded that the Defendant “the removal of the Cheong machine in front of the Plaintiff,” and in the process, the Defendant was punished for a dispute.”

(당시 피고는 신고를 받고 출동한 경찰관에게 ‘2년간 교제하면서 항상 돈을 요구하여 온 원고가 괘씸하여 원고에게 그 동안 원고의 사생활을 도청하였다’고 거짓말을 하였을 뿐이라고 주장하였으며, 피고가 실제로 도청장치를 설치하여 원고를 감시하였는지 여부는 밝혀지지 않았다). 원고는 위와 같이 말다툼을 벌이던 끝에, 피고에 의하여 목이 졸리고, 머리채가 잡히는 등의 폭행을 당하였다고 경찰서에 범죄 신고를 하였으나(당시 피고는 신고를 받고 출동한 경찰관에게 ’서로 말다툼을 하였을 뿐, 원고를 폭행하지는 않았다‘고 주장하였다), 이후 위 사건의 담당 경찰관에게 피고에 대한 처벌불원서를 제출하였다.

Accordingly, on January 6, 2016, the chief of the police station of the Gyeonggi Ansan Winter Games held that the crime of assault was a crime of no punishment against the plaintiff. Since the plaintiff expressed his intention not to punish the defendant, he will terminate the defendant's internal intention on the crime of assault.

‘The notification of the results of the case' was made.

C. On March 31, 2016, the Plaintiff is the Suwon District Court.