logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2014.06.05 2014고단377
도로교통법위반(음주측정거부)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 10 million won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 18, 2014, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (refluence of the measurement of drinking level) (refluence of drinking level) was required to respond to a request for the measurement of drinking level on three occasions between 20 minutes and 20 minutes, on the grounds that there are reasonable grounds to recognize that the Defendant was driving under the influence of drinking, such as drinking, smelling, red, and difficult walking at the Defendant’s entrance from a slopeF affiliated with the former and American Police Station Epia, while driving the Dbea cruise car in the influence of drinking on the road prior to the development of the cultural resources of the Gu and America at the time, on April 18, 2014.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) and driven the said Dbea cruise car without obtaining a driver’s license at the same time and place as the above paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the ledger of driver's licenses, such as reports on the situation of running a motor vehicle with a motor vehicle driving, reports on the situation of a motor vehicle with a motor vehicle with a motor vehicle driving, reports on internal history (with respect to attachment, etc. of photographs rejecting the

1. Article 148-2(1)2 of the Road Traffic Act and Articles 148-2(2) of the Act on the Punishment of the Crime and the Selection of Punishment for the Violation of the Road Traffic Act (the rejection of drinking alcohol measurement), the choice of fines for the violation of the Road Traffic Act (the operation without a license) and the selection of fines for the violation of the Road Traffic Act (the violation of the Road Traffic Act (the violation of the Act on August 29, 2013, in addition to the issuance of a summary order of a fine of 6 million won as a crime of drinking driving) more than four times, the same court on December 27, 2012 committed a crime even though it was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for 10 months as a crime of injury, suspended the execution of the sentence for 3 years as a person who has been tried to drive on that ground, and there is no reason to believe that the crime was caused to the crime, such as a delivery of a divorce from the wife on the day of the crime, and the current father and wife of the child as well-born.

arrow