logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2019.05.14 2018가단220394
건물명도(인도)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff (hereinafter “Plaintiff church”) is a church with the “principal church” in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and has 61 regional arts dividends nationwide.

On January 3, 2006, the defendant was appointed as the assistant pastor of the plaintiff on January 3, 2006, and around January 2013, as the assistant pastor of the plaintiff church, he was dispatched to the missionary work of the Korean Institute of Diplomatic Association, which was established for the affairs of the plaintiff church, and later dispatched to the general affairs of the missionary work of the Korean Institute of Diplomatic Association on January 2015.

B. On April 9, 2010, the Plaintiff church completed the registration of ownership transfer on the instant real estate, and used it as a company house affiliated to the said Promotion Institute from that time.

The Defendant occupied the instant real estate from January 201, 2013, which was dispatched by the missionary mission of the said Promotion Agency, and occupied and used the instant real estate from that time to that time.

C. Since the F established the Plaintiff church on November 30, 1969, around November 30, 1969, it was in the position of supervision, which is the representative of the Plaintiff church. However, on January 3, 2013, the F declared that on January 1, 2013, G, one of its children, was dismissed from the supervisory office of the Plaintiff church and was delegated to it as a supervisor.

A immediately after that, according to the internal rules of the Plaintiff church and the rules of the administrative affairs council, the procedures were conducted to confirm that the subcommittee of the Plaintiff church was appointed as a new representative on the premise of the resignation of the F representative.

G from around that time, while performing the supervisory duties of the Plaintiff church, G resigned from the supervisory office on March 12, 2017.

However, the F, without taking any separate office procedure after the resignation of G, appointed H on March 13, 2017 as the chief secretary general secretary and the chief secretary of the wooden Council cooperation office while performing the supervisory duties of the Plaintiff church.

E. On December 22, 2017, the head of the Plaintiff church’s religious conference cooperation office H shall file a request for disciplinary decision with the chairperson of the personnel committee of the Plaintiff church to leave the Defendant’s workplace, refuse to guide the church, refuse to supervise the church, and defame the Plaintiff church.

arrow