Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On October 25, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment by the Jeju District Court for interference with the execution of official duties, and completed the execution of the sentence in Jeju Prison on April 7, 2015.

On October 26, 2016, around 21:10, the Defendant: (a) heard that the Defendant’s daily movement of the Defendant at the front of the entrance of the fifth apartment zone in the Nowon-gu, Nowon-gu, Jeju-gu, 2016, was added to the transit cost from the victim C (36 tax) who driven the Defendant’s vehicle at the front of the entrance of the fifth apartment zone in the Nowon-gu, Nowon-gu, 12, and that the transit cost would be added to the Defendant’s vehicle. The Defendant assaulted the victim, such as: (b) the victim argued that the victim would have claimed for a reasonable rate; (c) the victim would live in the form of fat of the victim; and (d) the victim’s fating the victim’s fat that the victim would get off at the vehicle and fat the number of seeing the amount

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C’s statement;

1. Relevant photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report (the confirmation of whether the victim has agreed to agree and the date of expiration of the final term of punishment);

1. Relevant Article 260 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act selection of punishment, and selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. In light of the fact that the reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (hereinafter “Criminal Procedure Act”), the criminal records of the Defendant’s past crime or the nature of the instant crime is bad, it is necessary to take measures to strictly punish the Defendant and prevent him from repeating the crime.

However, in light of the fact that the result of the crime of this case is relatively not severe, the defendant is against the defendant, and the family is responsible for supporting the family, the decision is made as the disposition of the fine.