logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2012.11.16 2009나18399
채무부존재확인
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, remainder after the exception of the plaintiff K and M, which correspond to the following order of payment:

Reasons

In light of the overall purport of the arguments, the above plaintiffs' ownership and residence status were examined as follows. In light of all such facts, the defendant determined the above plaintiffs' eligibility as the person eligible for relocation measures, and concluded each contract for the sale of this case with the above plaintiffs since the base date ( May 6, 2002) to the date of concluding the compensation contract or the date of expropriation decision, and the compensation plan announcement date ( October 30, 2003) to the date of the first announcement of the compensation plan ( October 30, 2003) to the date of the first announcement of the compensation plan.

* Plaintiff G: On November 20, 2001, one house is acquired on the Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan City X ground (it is recorded in the register), and on October 31, 2002, Plaintiff H: on January 18, 200, two underground units are acquired (it is recorded in the register) among apartment houses on the ground of Songpa-gu Seoul, Seoul, and on March 25, 2002, it is transferred to that domicile on March 25, 2002.* Plaintiff K: 202 of the first floor multi-household houses on the ground of Songpa-gu, Seoul, Seoul (it is excluded from the first registration on October 28, 1987), and the first building on the ground of Article 202 of the Enforcement Decree of the former Building Act (it is not registered on April 18, 2002, or multi-household houses on the building without permission on March 23, 2002).

arrow