1. To seek revocation of the imposition of each insurance premium from December 2, 2016 to April 2017 among the instant lawsuits.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff is a locally provided policyholder under the National Health Insurance Act.

B. The Defendant imposed health insurance premiums and long-term care insurance premiums on the Plaintiff as stated below, and the Plaintiff was served at the end of the month when each insurance premium was imposed.

(1) On December 132, 2016, 132, 540 8, 140 8, 140 8, 220 141, 20 140 8, 680 8, 680 8, 680 140 8, 680 141, 20 8, 203, 20 147 8, 207 132, 58, 207 4. 20, 208, 130, 540 8, 1408, 207 20, 2017 4. 8, 205, 207, 16. 4. 20, 205, 207, 2017

2. To make entries in the attached statutes concerned;

3. The lawsuit seeking revocation of the disposition, etc. by the administrative agency on the legitimacy of the part concerning the 1 through 5 of the lawsuit of this case shall be filed within 90 days from the date on which the relevant disposition, etc. is

(1) Article 20(1)1 of the Administrative Litigation Act provides that “The part of the instant lawsuit that the Defendant sought the revocation of the instant disposition 1 through 5 is filed against the Plaintiff on December 21, 2016; January 20, 2017; February 20, 2017; February 20, 2017; March 21, 2017; and April 21, 2017; the Plaintiff was served on the instant disposition 1 through 5 on the last day of the pertinent month; and the instant lawsuit was filed on August 7, 2017 after the lapse of 90 days from the date of receipt of the instant disposition 1 through 5; thus, the part that the instant disposition 1 through 5, among the instant lawsuit, was filed against the filing period, and is unlawful.

4. Whether the dispositions of this case 6 to 8 are legitimate

A. The plaintiff's assertion is based on the apartment owned by the plaintiff for residential purpose.