logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2020.11.27 2020고단8160
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2020. 8. 29. 02:10경 인천 계양구 B C호에서 ‘아빠가 술에 취하여 행패를 부린다’라는 112 신고를 접수하고 출동한 인천계양경찰서 D지구대 소속 경위 E, 순경 F, 같은 경찰서 G팀 소속 경사 H에게 “좆 같은 새끼들아. 다 꺼져라”고 욕설을 하고, 출동경찰관들이 신고자인 피고인의 가족들을 대상으로 신고 내용을 청취하자 피고인의 바지에서 혁대를 풀어 손에 쥔 다음 이를 경위 E와 순경 F의 얼굴을 향해 휘두르듯이 때리고 이를 제지하는 경사 H의 손목을 발로 1회 차 폭행하고 계속하여 피고인을 현행범인으로 체포하는 피해자 F(남, 27세)의 왼쪽 팔을 이로 물었다.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with police officers' 112 reported cases, protection of people's lives and bodies, prevention and suppression of crimes, and legitimate performance of duties to investigate crimes, and at the same time, the Defendant committed an open top-down measure for the following parts that require approximately two weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to police statements made to E, H and F, on-site photographs and investigation reports (Attachment of Medical Opinion) by each police officer's statement made to E, H and F;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is that the degree of assault against the police officers of this case is not less exceptionally.

However, there is no record of criminal punishment since around 199 that the defendant recognized the crime, and there is no record of criminal punishment against the defendant. The fact that the defendant discovered the police officer and deposited 500,000 won of medical expenses for the police officer who suffered damage, and the slopeH wishes to take the defendant's action against the defendant as to the obstruction of performance of official duties, and other reasons leading to the defendant's crime.

arrow