logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2014.03.24 2014고단353
도로법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On December 27, 2005, at around 20:04, the Defendant violated the instant charges on the vehicle operation restriction by a road management agency, by driving the freight loaded with the freight exceeding 10t of 11.68t of DNA freight vehicles owned by the Defendant, in relation to the Defendant’s business on the road at a point of 7.4km located in Busan Metropolitan Highway, Busan Metropolitan Highway.

2. The Constitutional Court rendered a decision of unconstitutionality on the portion of Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 1995; Act No. 7832, Dec. 30, 2005; Act No. 7832, Oct. 28, 2010; Act No. 8315, Oct. 28, 2010; Act No. 8665, Oct. 28, 2010; Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 2095; Act No. 7832, Dec. 30, 2005; Act No. 4777, Jan. 2, 2005; Act No. 83155, Oct. 2, 200) that “if an agent, employee, or other employee of a corporation commits an offense under Article 83(1)2,

3. According to the conclusion, the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, and thus, is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act

arrow