logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2020.04.24 2019나56447
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

The reasoning of the judgment of this court is that of the first instance judgment, except for adding the following judgments, and such reasoning is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

In full view of the allegations in the grounds of appeal and the video of Gap evidence No. 7 additionally submitted by the plaintiff in addition to the evidence submitted in the first instance trial, it is insufficient to recognize that the defendants performed construction, such as removal of a concrete floor of a parking lot, for the purpose of gas pipeline construction of a new building after the agreement of this case, and there is no evidence to acknowledge otherwise.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim must be dismissed as there is no reasonable ground.

The judgment of the court of first instance is justifiable in its conclusion, and it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

arrow