logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.06.09 2015고단2933
사기등
Text

As to the crimes of No. 1 in the judgment of the defendant, fines of 3,00,000 won, and crimes of No. 2 and No. 3 in the judgment of the defendant, shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 11, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for a term of fraud at the Daegu District Court, which was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for a term of fraud, and the above judgment was finalized on September 25, 2008, and on May 6, 2009, the Daegu District Court sentenced one year of imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (such as re-issuance of evidence), and was finally sentenced to two years of suspended sentence on December 10, 2009.

1. On January 2008, the Defendant of KRW 25 million against the victim C told the victim C to pay 25 million by the 20th day of the following month, if the Defendant borrowed KRW 25 million to the director of the loan division of the Korea Agricultural Cooperative.

However, there was no fact that E had requested the Defendant to lend money, and even if he borrowed money from the damaged party, there was no intention or ability to repay the money.

On January 15, 2008, the defendant acquired 25 million won from the damaged party to the defendant's Nonghyup Bank account.

2. On September 2009, the Defendant would lend KRW 30 million to the victim C with the purchase fund of 30 million on the steel-line in the mutual influence room located in the Daegu Suwon-gu Suwondong-gu, Daegu-gu, 2009. The Defendant would provide the victim C with the payment of KRW 200 million on the land owned by the F of Daegu Northern-gu, Daegu-gu, and KRW 300 million on the security list, and deliver it even with the payment guarantee of the new bank.

“.....”

However, the facts did not have the intention or ability to establish a collateral security for G-owned land, and there was no intention or ability to issue a new bank payment guarantee, and there was no intention to repay within the time limit.

On September 2009, the Defendant received 30 million won from the injured party at the I hotel coffee shop located in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, and acquired it by fraud.

3. The Defendant, at the end of September, 2009, exercised the said investigation document ethyl with the obligor’s swelved from steel purchase hub at the I hotel coffee shop located in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu.

arrow