logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.07.07 2015가단5338651
구상금
Text

1. Defendant (Appointed Party) A, Appointed B, C, D, E, and F are within the scope of the property inherited from G, respectively, 8,168.

Reasons

1. In full view of the facts stated in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 8, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2, as well as the purport of the entire pleadings, Eul died on Jan. 13, 2015. Accordingly, as the next-order inheritor, the defendant (appointed party; hereinafter "the defendant") who is the sibling A, appointed party B, C, D, E, and F jointly inherited his/her property according to the ratio of 1/6 shares, respectively, and the defendant A, appointed party B, C, D, E, and F reported the qualified acceptance of inheritance under the Seoul Family Court Ordinance No. 31575 dated Apr. 4, 2016.

2. According to the above facts of recognition, Defendant A, Selection B, C, D, E, and F are obligated to pay 8,168,31 won (49,09,90 won x 1/6) within the scope of inherited property from G, and 12% per annum from August 20, 2014 to August 31, 2015, the day following the date of subrogation, from August 20, 2014 to June 15, 2017; and 8% per annum from the next day to June 15, 2017; and 15% per annum from the next day to the date of full payment.

3. Thus, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow