beta
Text
1. The Plaintiff:
A. As to Defendant B, C, and D, the amount of KRW 1,325,00,000 jointly and as to Defendant B, the amount of KRW 1,325,00,000.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. Defendant B is a video trade operated in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu, that is, Defendant C is a picture with a major in paintings. Defendant C is a person who sells curios while coming to and going to Japan, Defendant E is a child of Defendant D, Defendant F is a “M” in Seoul Jongno-gu, and Defendant G is a video operated in Jongno-gu Seoul N, Seoul.
B. On August 10, 2012, the Plaintiff purchased KRW 910,000,000 from Defendant H H C’s picture 2 (hereinafter “instant appraisal report”) held by Defendant F via Defendant F, and received two copies of the Defendant Company’s appraisal report (hereinafter “instant appraisal report”) on July 20, 2012, to the effect that the said KRW 2 of the picture was a serious product of Defendant HH white. On the same day, the Plaintiff paid KRW 910,000,000 to Defendant F.
C. In addition, on December 4, 2012, the Plaintiff received a letter to the effect that “If the appraisal of the forest is not completed by May 2, 2013, the appraisal of the forest would be returned (if an appraisal statement is not received), 415 million won shall be returned).” On the same day, the Plaintiff paid KRW 415 million to Defendant F of the purchase price.
On the other hand, on February 28, 2013, Defendant G prepared a letter of guarantee of works (hereinafter “the letter of guarantee of works of this case”) stating that “I will guarantee the contents of the above works,” and Defendant H will make on September 27, 2013 that “I will confirm that the said works are their progress,” No. 40, and No. 1979, and No. 1972, Dec. 4, 2012. The letter of guarantee of works of this case (hereinafter “the letter of guarantee of works of this case”) to the Plaintiff on September 27, 2013, and the letter of confirmation that I will confirm that the said works are their progress (hereinafter “the certificate of confirmation”).
However, the plaintiff purchased through the defendant F.