1. On January 1, 2015, Defendant C, Defendant C, Defendant D, and E, respectively, with respect to KRW 11,259,143 and each of the above amounts.

1. Recognizing the fact-finding B (hereinafter referred to as “the network”) from the F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Nonindicted Co., Ltd.”) around April 2014, among the H care source new construction works in G located in G in Esan. (2) The equipment installation works. (3) The annual installation works. (4) The water supply and demand pipe installation works. (5) The water supply and demand pipe installation works. (7) The gas pipeline installation works (hereinafter referred to as “the subcontracted works in this case”) were subcontracted to KRW 50 million (excluding value-added tax).

On July 3, 2014, the Plaintiff was a company specializing in the business of manufacturing and constructing a re-subcontract with the A-Gratom (hereinafter “Satom”). On July 3, 2014, the Plaintiff entered into a construction contract with the deceased for the construction cost of KRW 51,70,000 (including value-added tax) and the construction period for the re-subcontracting construction work (hereinafter “re-subcontracting work in this case”) with the cost of construction cost of KRW 5,170,00 (including value-added tax) and completed the construction work with the amount of KRW 6,593,000 from July 1, 2014 to July 31, 2014, excluding the portion of the non-subcontracting construction from the end of December 2014.

The re-subcontract of this case that the plaintiff re-subcontracted by the plaintiff does not include the installation of a stack and apparatus, the installation of hot water and the pipe installed on the pipe pipe with hot water and water supply water, and the pipe-to-project with a pVC, PVC 5G2, PVC 90, PVC 90, support metal distribution, co-child (D150), and co-child (D100) are not within the scope of construction. The construction cost for the 87.25% completed portion is 45,107,000 won, and the construction cost for the non-construction portion is 6,593,000 won.

The plaintiff received KRW 5,700,000 from the deceased as the price for construction.

Upon completion of 90% of the deceased’s work process, the non-party company failed to perform the work and suspended the work any longer.

On March 10, 2019, the Deceased died on March 10, 2019 during the instant lawsuit, and his heir is Defendant C and E, who is the wife.

Grounds for recognition: Facts without dispute, A, 1 through 3.