logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2018.04.25 2016고단1350
사기
Text

The Defendants publish the summary of the judgment on each of the Defendants not guilty.

Each of the applicants for compensation.

Reasons

1. Defendant A is an insurance solicitor belonging to “I”, who is an insurance company located in Ha in Y in Y in the Jeonsan-gu, Jeonju-si, and Defendant B is the husband of her woman, Defendant C is the child of her woman, and Defendant D and Defendant E are the birth of her woman.

Although the Defendants did not have to pay the insurance premium of KRW KRW 100,000 per month due to economic circumstances, the Defendants came to know that Defendant A, while working as an insurance designer, had become aware of the fact that Defendant A would normally be paid in the case of long-term hospitalization within 120 days between a year and a year under the same type of disease, and that high-amount of insurance proceeds, other than the medical expenses, are paid in addition to the medical expenses, as a result of the examination, because long-term hospitalization is unnecessary or there is no special opinion in terms of treatment, and as a result, no specific treatment is given. However, the Defendants conspired to use large amount of insurance proceeds as living expenses, etc. by acquiring a large amount of insurance proceeds by facilitating the issuance or long-term hospitalization by taking out several insurance contracts after entering into account several insurance companies,

2. On October 19, 2009, Defendant A filed a claim for insurance proceeds against the Victim L corporation for KRW 2,610,000 from March 11, 2008 to October 23, 2014, by receiving KRW 2,610,00 as the insurance proceeds on November 19, 201, the Defendant received KRW 193,273,089 in total as the insurance proceeds from the victim insurance companies under the name of the damage insurance company as shown in the annexed crime list (A) from around 32 times as shown in the annexed crime list to October 23, 2014.

3. Defendant B received hospitalization for 16 days until September 24, 201, even though it is appropriate for the N Hospital located in Geumcheon-gu M on September 9, 201, and the fact that the Defendant was hospitalized for about 7 days due to salt pane, tension, etc., but was hospitalized for 16 days until September 24, 201, against the victim L Co., Ltd.

arrow