Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment for four months.

However, the two years each from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a business owner engaged in the manufacturing of machinery with the trade name of "E" in the wife population D, and is not a recipient of industrial accident compensation insurance benefits, and Defendant B is engaged in the repair of machinery in the trade name of "G" from the wife population F in Young-si.

Defendant

A A around April 1, 2011, while performing line work at a factory of E around April 1, 201, he/she is towing with the machinery.

During the period of being hospitalized in the "I hospital" located in Young-si H, Young-si, I would like to keep the documents as if the accident occurred in another place of business and receive industrial accident insurance benefits.

Upon receipt of the proposal to the purport, Defendant B asked Defendant B to deal with the same as the accident occurred at G’s workplace, and Defendant B consented to this request, and Defendant B decided to take charge of the document processing with the nameless labor company upon Defendant A’s request, and thereby, the Defendants conspired with the nameless hospital office, nameless labor company, and industrial accident compensation insurance benefits by manipulating the circumstances of the accident along with the nameless hospital office, nameless labor company, etc.

Accordingly, around April 7, 2011, Defendant B was involved in an accident while the said “G” workplace received KRW 200,000 per day from G in daily work at the said workplace and received KRW 200,000 per day, and delivered the documents, such as a written confirmation, written statement, etc., to the said workplace, and then transferred the amount equivalent to KRW 39,000 per day to the Defendant A’s account as a daily day, and the said non-name-based labor company prepared the relevant documents, such as a written confirmation of the name of Defendant A, upon delegation by Defendant A, and submitted the written application for medical care benefits and relevant documents to the ordinary housing site of the Labor Welfare Corporation around April 9, 201.

As a result, the Defendants, in collusion with the non-registered victims, deceiving the Victim Labor Welfare Service as above, and deceiving the victims, on May 3, 2011, as the compensation for business suspension.