logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2016.12.14 2016고단1955
공무집행방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine not exceeding seven million won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant causing property damage, on August 23, 2016, is moving to the direction of the large-scale smoke distance in the south-gu Busan Metropolitan City by getting on the front line of the building in front of the Busan Metropolitan City, Suwon-gu, at around 05:05 on August 23, 2016, the victim D (year 72) is on board in front of

Along with the fact that the victim does not have his own cell phone, the victim saw the danger of his operation, intending to straw up the taxi, and intending for the victim, and scam the victim's card payment machines and internal strings installed on the front day of the taxi, and damaged the repair cost by 279,500 won.

2. The Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender of damage and damage to property in the F District of the Busan Southern Police Station located in Suwon-gu, Busan, around 05:20 on the same day, and was waiting for the investigation.

The Defendant, while making a statement about the content of the damage, expressed the above victim’s desire to read “Yei Chewing marine”, and expressed that “the Defendant will do so by holding a police officer who refrained from doing so after drinking the sprinkling sprinkling, sprinking, and cutting down the sprink to the earth’s floor.” The Defendant saw the sprinkling of sprinkling on the earth’s floor.

The Defendant wanted to take toilets to G (33 years of age) belonging to the said global belt, and entered the toilet together with him, and assaulted the above police officer, such as intending to have a direction-setting system that was kept in the toilet without viewing the urine, towards the face of the said G, and intending to keep the son on his hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the management of flagrant offenders arrested by the above police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each statement made to D and G;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged articles, investigation reports (investigation into the current situation, etc. at the time of their withdrawal), blackbox CDs, global CCTV CDs, investigation reports (a written estimate attached), and written estimates;

1. Article 366 of the Criminal Act and Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of punishment (the point of causing property damage and the choice of fines).

arrow