logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2014.06.18 2013고단3276
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment for six months.

However, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Criminal facts

The Defendants thought that the victim C (the age of 16) did not make back the Defendant A, etc., with the Victim D, E, and F, for the reason that the Victim C (the age of 16) did not bring the back to the Defendant A.

피고인들은 2013. 5. 5 21:10경 안산시 단원구 고잔동에 있는 롯데시네마 건물 옥상에서 위와 같은 이유로 피해자를 불러낸 후 피고인 A은 손바닥으로 피해자 얼굴을 수십회 때리고 발로 피해자의 다리 부위를 수회 차고 넘어진 피해자를 발로 밟고, 피고인 B은 손바닥으로 피해자의 뺨을 수회 때리고 발로 피해자의 가슴을 수회 차고 넘어진 피해자를 발로 밟았으며, D는 주먹으로 피해자의 가슴과 얼굴 부위를 각각 1회 때리고 무릎으로 피해자의 가슴을 1회 때리고, E는 발로 피해자의 몸 부위를 수회 찼으며, F은 손바닥으로 피해자의 얼굴 부위를 수회 때렸다.

As a result, the Defendants jointly with D, E, and F put the victim into the left-hand side of the side where the victim needs to receive approximately three weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol for F, D, G, or E;

1. Each police statement of C and H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Article 2 (2) and (1) 3 of the Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc. and Punishment of Specific Crimes, Article 2 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment with labor;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act, each suspended sentence, as follows;

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62-2(1) of the Criminal Code of the Social Service Order and Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc. is the case where the defendants jointly committed the crime, and the defendants committed the crime of this case on the grounds that the victim did not talk about his behavior, and thus, the victim did not recover from damage to the victim, and the degree of the harm of the defendant A was grave compared to the defendant B in the crime of this case.

arrow