A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 11, 2014, the Defendant and C, along with D, wished to forge a real estate lease agreement in order to temporarily cancel the protection of male-friendly job offering E, which is disclosed on December 11, 2014 due to illegal stay.

On December 31, 2014, at G cafeteria located in C and D, around 10:00 on December 31, 2014, the Defendant entered the column for the location of the real estate lease agreement that the Defendant prepared at C upon C’s request, “H H 301 at all times” and “25,000,000 won” in the column for the lease agreement of real estate, and signed the contract deposit in the column for the contract term, “one millions”, “one millions of part payments”, “one thousands of payment”, “one day payment on April 5, 2012”, “I”, “resident registration numberJ”, “K”, and “L” in the column for the lessor’s name.

Accordingly, the Defendant, in collusion with C and D, forged one Chapter of the Real Estate Lease Contract in the name of L, a private document on rights and obligations for the purpose of exercising.

2. On December 31, 2014, the Defendant and C exercised the instant investigation document as if they were duly formed a forged real estate lease agreement with the public official in charge of the name in charge of the fact of forgery at the infinite Immigration Office, which was 265 via a radio route at the time of infinite, at around 13:00, as seen above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Partial statement of the witness D;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect C by the police;

1. A copy of a real estate lease agreement;

1. Application of a copy of a written request for temporary cancellation of protection;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act; Articles 231 and 30 of the Criminal Act; Articles 234, 231, and 30 of the Criminal Act; and the choice of imprisonment with labor, respectively;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The responsibility of the instant crime is heavy in light of the fact that the instant crime was committed to interfere with the legitimate exercise of authority over immigration control by a public official on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act.

except that the defendant has a benefit derived from such action.