The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The defendant on the grounds of appeal can only admonish the convenience store employees on the ground that he did not interfere with his duties.

The sentence of the court below is hot.

2. According to the evidence duly admitted and adopted by the lower court, the lower court is sufficiently recognized that the Defendant interfered with the victim’s convenience store business by force by avoiding disturbance, such as taking a bath and obsing sexual intercourse.

Considering the Defendant’s petition of appeal, statement of reason for appeal, and other factors of sentencing revealed in the record of trial, the lower court’s punishment is heavy even considering the circumstances alleged by the Defendant.

subsection (b) of this section.

The defendant's appeal is dismissed without holding any pleadings pursuant to Article 364 (5) of the Criminal Procedure Act.