Main Issues
The term "themea TPPRAMYCIN trademark" and "themea TTRAMYCIN trademark" are likely to cause confusions or confusions in trade due to the flame's death.
The term "themea TPPRAMYCIN trademark" and "themea TRAMYCIN trademark" are similar to the other "themea TRAMYCIN trademark" and are likely to cause confusions and confusions in trade.
[Reference Provisions]
Article 5 of the Trademark Act
claimant-Appellant
Jaco-spha and commercial companies
Appellant-Appellee
Modrified Possition Co.
original decision
Patent Court Decision 101 decided July 6, 1968
Text
The original adjudication shall be destroyed, and the case shall be remanded to the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, the Patent Office, the High Trial Office, and the High Trial Office.
Reasons
The grounds of appeal by the claimant’s agent Lee Young-woo
According to the reasoning of the judgment of the court below, since the former is composed of "TRAYIN" and the latter is composed of "KEWHA" or "teine," it cannot be viewed as a whole as being similar to the former, and the latter is called "teme," and the latter is called as "teme," and the latter is called as "teme," and the latter is called as "teme," and the latter is called as "teme," and the latter is called as "teme," and the latter's "teme," and the latter's "teme," as a whole, can be seen as an "teme," and the latter's "teme," as a whole, cannot be seen as an "teme," and the latter's "teme," as a whole, can be seen as an "teme," and the latter's "teme," as an "teme," the latter's "teme," and it can be seen as an "teme," and the latter's "teme," as an "teme,".
Supreme Court Judges Kim Young-chul (Presiding Judge) (Presiding Justice) Mag-gim Kim, Kim Jong-dae and Yang-Namng