logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 진주지원 2019.08.13 2019고단441
사기방조
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 3, 2018, the employee of the name scam scam scam scam scam scam scam scam scam scam scam scam scam scam scam scam scam scam scam scam scam scam scam scam scam scam scam scam scam scam scam scam scam

On December 3, 2018, the Defendant: (a) withdrawn KRW 22.7 million from a corporate bank near Jin-si Bus Terminal around Jin-si, Seoul on December 3, 2018; and (b) aided and abetted the Defendant to commit the crime by making it easier for the Defendant to commit the crime by using the above KRW 22.7 million to the names of the winners who sent it to the said Bosing Organization on the roads near the address.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. B’s petition and written statement;

1. Application of the details of transfer transactions, response materials to financial institutions, and statutes on dialogue;

1. Relevant Article 347(1) and Article 32(1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Articles 32 (2) and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to be mitigated legally;

1. The crime of this case with the reason of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act shall be considered as follows: (a) under the unfavorable circumstances that the defendant withdraws cash and facilitates the singing of the singinging employee to commit the instant crime; (b) under the circumstances that there is a need to strictly punish the defendant in light of the social harm and injury of the singinginging employee; (c) the confession of the defendant; (d) there is no record of punishment for the same kind of crime; (d) the defendant is likely to have taken advantage of his name and unsing the statement that he would be able to commit the instant crime; and (e) the defendant would have taken advantage of the fact that he would not have profit acquired by the instant

arrow